America Is Closing Its API

For decades, America ran the most generous open API the world has ever seen.

Free trade agreements. Open borders for goods. Most Favored Nation status handed out like developer keys. The pitch was simple: let anyone plug into the American economic engine, send us your exports, access our consumer market, and the rising tide of efficiency will lift all boats.

It was the economic equivalent of a tech company launching a free, unlimited API and telling the world: build on us.

And build they did. China became the world’s factory floor. Mexico became the nearshore assembly line. American companies moved upstream into design, IP, and brand while outsourcing the actual making of things to whoever could do it cheapest.

If you’ve spent any time in tech, you’ve seen this movie before.

The Free Tier Is Over

Remember when APIs were free? Google Maps, Twitter, Facebook. They flung open their platforms with zero restrictions. Third-party developers flooded in and built entire businesses on top of them. The platforms got distribution and network effects. Everyone won.

I would know. We ran this exact playbook at Buddy Media, building on Facebook, and again at Troops.ai.

building on Slack. It worked incredibly well. Both companies were acquired. But eventually, Facebook and Slack looked at what we’d built and realized they were giving away the store. They natively integrated our killer features into their own platforms. The open API giveth, and the open API taketh away.

Then came the pricing pages. Twitter killed its free API and started charging. Google Maps jacked up rates overnight and thousands of startups scrambled to rearchitect. OpenAI and every major LLM provider now charge per token, metering every single request that touches their infrastructure. What was once free became a line item, then a serious expense, then a strategic bottleneck.

That’s a tariff. Dressed up in developer docs instead of trade policy, but the mechanism is identical. You built on our platform for free while we were growing. Now we’re charging because we realize the value of what we’ve been giving away.

@gokulr talked about this strategy playing out at Facebook and Google. The result? They are two of the very best companies in the world. And there’s a graveyard of startups to show for it.

Look at U.S. trade policy and tell me it’s not the same pattern. Tariffs on Chinese goods. Reshoring incentives through the CHIPS Act. Restrictions on technology exports. Universal baseline tariffs floated every few months.

The message is the same one every maturing platform eventually sends: you’ve been accessing our infrastructure for free, and that era is over.

@howardlutnick recently delivered this very message at Davos.

Outsourcing Your Leverage

In tech, the open API era gave way to vertical integration. The companies that actually won didn’t just build platforms for others to plug into. They owned the full stack. Apple designs its own chips. Tesla manufactures its own batteries. Amazon runs the logistics, the cloud, and increasingly makes the products it sells.

The lesson is straightforward: when you outsource everything, you outsource your leverage. Open systems are great for growth. They’re terrible for defensibility.

America is learning this now, and the stakes are a lot higher than a startup losing access to an API.

When you outsource your manufacturing base to a geopolitical rival, you don’t just create a supply chain dependency. You create a military vulnerability. The same country making your consumer electronics makes components that go into defense systems. The same rare earth minerals that power your iPhone power your fighter jets. If the relationship deteriorates and the API gets shut off, you’re not dealing with empty shelves at Walmart. You’re dealing with a compromised ability to build the weapons your military needs to function.

This is why the U.S. is now backing American companies to acquire mineral mines in the Congo, competing directly with China’s decades-long head start locking up critical mineral supply chains across Africa. It’s full stack integration at a national level. You can’t just design the chip or assemble the product. You need to own the mine that produces the cobalt and lithium that make any of it possible in the first place.

Apple started designing its own silicon instead of buying from Intel. America is starting to secure its own minerals instead of buying from China. Same logic, wildly different consequences if you get it wrong. Apple ships a slower laptop. America loses the ability to defend itself.

The Stack Is the Strategy

The shift has real costs. Rate-limited APIs slow innovation at the edges. Tariffs raise consumer prices. Vertical integration is expensive and operationally brutal. There’s a reason companies outsourced in the first place, and there’s a reason countries did too.

But the calculus has changed. The question isn’t “what’s the most efficient way to produce things?” anymore. It’s “what’s the most resilient way to produce things, and who captures the value when things get tense?” This is especially true for strategically important categories like AI, weapons, defense, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare.

Tech learned this lesson already. The most valuable companies in the world aren’t the ones with the most open platforms. They’re the ones that control the critical and most valuable layers of their own stack.

America is running the same playbook at nation-state scale. The API is closing. The free tier is gone. And the winners in the next era, in both tech and geopolitics, will be the ones who own their stack from the mine to the microchip.

America Is Closing Its API Read More »

Meet Thensome.com

Some of the best ideas come from simple questions.
Like: What if you could add THC to any drink you already love—without changing the taste, smell, or vibe?

That’s what we’ve built with Thensome.com. A flavorless, tasteless THC beverage enhancer you can add to cocktails, mocktails, coffee, beer, or water. Whatever you’re drinking, now you can have your drink… and Thensome.

Why Now?

The world is shifting. People are drinking less and looking for better alternatives.

  • Alcohol consumption is at its lowest point in nearly 90 years (Gallup).
  • Daily cannabis use just passed daily alcohol use (AP News).
  • Gen Z overwhelmingly prefers cannabis to alcohol (CBS News).

The timing is right. Culture is ready.

The Team

As I’ve said a million times, the journey is the prize. And the only thing better than building something new is building it with your friends.

  • Steve Weisman knows the cannabis world inside and out, having started and selling his own cannabis company. It also helps that we studied electrical and computer engineering together, started two other companies together, and have been looking to build another project together for quite some time.
  • Peter Alden brings a deep background in sales and tech, and is what we’ll most definitely call a “product-centric” CEO here.
  • Emily Miller spent the past few years building one of the most forward-looking consumer brands, of which I was an investor, and she understands trends and the consumer mindset.

Different skills, same energy, shared vision.

So here we go.
Thensome.com is live.
The product is available for purchase.
Have your drink, and Thensome.

There is a lot more to come, but please let us know what you think and follow us.

And because I had to play around with some new AI tools..

Meet Thensome.com Read More »

Copying Isn’t Cheating (in some cases)— It’s Smart Strategy

“I wanted to win the Olympic gold medal. She did it. I figured, if I copied everything she did, I would win the Olympic gold medal too.”

I’m paraphrasing here, but that’s what Nastia Liukin, Olympic gold medalist, told me the first time we met. She was referring to another gold medalist gymnast who practiced at her gym. We were just starting to work together on TULA, where she became our first brand ambassador. Her mindset stuck with me, especially since it’s an approach I’d used too.

Most people think copying is wrong — even taboo. They confuse it with theft.

Yes, stealing someone’s work or IP is theft. But borrowing a framework that works? That’s not theft — that’s mentorship in disguise. It’s how we learn from people who’ve already figured it out.

When we launched TULA, we “stole” two core playbooks:

  1. Go narrow and deep with one motivated retail partner — a strategy my partner Ken used while building Bobbi Brown.
  2. Lean heavily into influencer marketing — something I saw work firsthand while building Spinback.

At Troops, we borrowed another winning formula: build on top of a widely adopted platform for accelerated distribution. In our case, it was Slack. At Buddy Media and Spinback, it was Facebook. One was a social network for the enterprise, the other was for consumers. Same strategy, different platform.

Even when hiring, I use frameworks and interview questions inspired by leaders like Zuckerberg and Musk — not to imitate, but to learn from their pattern recognition and what has clearly worked for them. Specific interview questions and frameworks I “stole”:

  • “What’s something you’ve done that is exceptional?” – Elon
  • “Would I work for this person?” – Mark

Now let’s be clear: there’s a line. I’ve seen companies cross it — pixel-for-pixel clones, one-to-one knockoffs. That’s theft. That’s lazy. That’s short-term. It’s also scummy.

But copying a strategy with intention and ethics? That’s just smart. The truth is, some of the most effective outcomes in business (and life) come from studying what works and adapting it well.

Copying isn’t the enemy. Done right, it’s a shortcut to excellence.

Nastia Liukin, Olympic gold medalist and TULA’s first brand partner

Copying Isn’t Cheating (in some cases)— It’s Smart Strategy Read More »

Walking Paradoxes: Why Our Contradictions Might Be Our Superpower

Humans are walking paradoxes—complex, layered, and often full of surprises. A scientist might spend her days decoding molecular structures, then go home and lose herself in oil paints. A finance executive could secretly be a poet, writing verses more moving than market trends. A waitress might be jotting down screenplay notes between tables, crafting stories that rival what’s showing on Netflix.

We often assume expertise must match a title, but some of the most profound insights come from the least expected places. And sometimes, it’s the combination of seemingly unrelated interests that creates true innovation. Steve Jobs is a perfect example—his fascination with calligraphy and philosophy, when fused with his love for technology, helped shape the aesthetic of modern computing. The Mac’s typeface and interface weren’t just functional; they were beautiful. That happened because of his paradoxes, not in spite of them.

On the flip side, titles alone don’t guarantee mastery. A parent volunteering part-time in a classroom might connect with students more deeply than a certified teacher. A high schooler passionate about geopolitics could out-analyze a foreign policy “expert.” And in the world of finance, we saw a retail investor like Roaring Kitty outsmart Wall Street veterans during the GameStop saga—doing his own research while hedge funds completely missed the mark.

When I was building TULA and Troops, I saw this firsthand. In the beauty industry, I was “the tech guy.” In tech, I was “the beauty guy.” But the randomness? That was the advantage. In beauty, we used SaaS playbooks. In SaaS, we applied consumer-brand marketing tactics. That cross-pollination made both companies better.

The truth is, skill, passion, and insight rarely wear name tags. They live in the curious, unpredictable spaces between our identities. That’s where magic often happens—where paradox becomes power.

Walking Paradoxes: Why Our Contradictions Might Be Our Superpower Read More »

Lotame Acquired By Publicis Groupe

Publicis Groupe has agreed to acquire ad tech firm Lotame, expanding the holding company’s global identity and data-management capabilities.” – Digiday

About eighteen years ago, I met Andy Monfried, who offered me an internship at his online advertising startup, Lotame. It was an opportunity I couldn’t pass up.

After graduating college, I joined full-time. But there was a catch—I had to reverse commute from NYC to Columbia, Maryland, where our headquarters was based. My days started early, really early. I’d wake up around 4 AM, jump in the car, and drive two to three hours to the office. During the week, I stayed in a corporate apartment with Andy, fully immersed in the startup grind. Then, every Friday, I’d drive back to the city, catch up with friends, and do it all over again the next week.

I kept up this routine until we eventually opened a New York office.

Looking back, those long drives to Maryland weren’t just part of the job—they were the foundation of an incredible journey. What I remember most isn’t the commute itself but the people I worked with. I was surrounded by some of the smartest minds in technology, and those early days shaped the way I think, work, and lead today.

Sometimes, the road to success is quite literally a long drive, wrapped up in a lot of patience —but if you’re surrounded by the right people, it’s always worth it.

Congrats Andy, Jeremy, and the rest of the Lotame team. Incredibly well-deserved!

Lotame Acquired By Publicis Groupe Read More »

The Text That Still Haunts Me

I’ve never shared this story before.

2008…

I was standing in the corner of my parents’ living room, fiddling with the audio settings for the outdoor speakers. Something wasn’t working right — the input and output were all mixed up, and I was reconfiguring the auxiliary settings. It’s a weird, random detail to remember so vividly, but I do.

Because that’s when I got the text.

“Dan, when are you coming to Chicago?”

“Not sure, probably in a few months. I’ll keep you posted.”

“I really need you.”

I sent back something like, “We’ll hang soon… you got this.”

Looking back now, I can’t stop thinking about how cold that response must have felt. How dismissive. How much he might have needed something more in that moment.

A week later, Jason was gone.

I never got the full story about why or how. But deep down, I knew.

I knew then.

He was reaching out. Asking for help. Saying it in the clearest way he could without actually saying the words. And I didn’t do a damn thing except send a hollow, meaningless response.

It haunts me to this day.

What if I’d been more compassionate?

What if I’d just called him?

What if I’d jumped on a plane?

What if I’d done anything more than sending a short text?

Would he still be here?

Maybe if we’d recreated the kind of support system we had in college — that rare feeling of closeness, understanding, and looking out for each other — maybe he would have been okay.

People try to comfort others in those moments. They say things like, “It’s not your fault. You did your best. There was nothing you could have done.”

And part of me wants to believe that.

But part of me knows that’s bullshit.

The truth is — I could have done more. I didn’t.

And maybe even the smallest gesture, the simplest act of care, could have made the difference.

I’ve been posting a lot lately about hard work, strength, pushing through. But the reality is, sometimes we don’t need toughness. Sometimes we just need compassion.

Understanding.

Presence.

No answers. No solutions. Just showing up and being there.

So why am I sharing this now?

Honestly, I’m not even sure. Maybe I’m just rewiring my brain, trying to be a little kinder to myself and to others.

Because I’ve learned — and keep learning — that everyone is going through something we can’t always see or understand.

Be there.

Be compassionate.

Peel back the layers.

It could literally change someone’s life. Maybe even save it.

Rest easy, bro.

The Text That Still Haunts Me Read More »

How I Outsmarted a Trademark Troll Shaking Me Down for $552

One of my favorite wins in business started with a trademark troll trying to extort me for $552. Here’s the story.

My co-founder, Dr. Raj, had just published an article in Health Magazine. As the medical editor for the magazine, her work was featured regularly. This particular article included a generic, stock photo of a woman—nothing fancy or AI-generated, just a plain image.

The photo looked like a non-AI version of this…

At the time, we were building content for our website, tulforlife.com, to boost credibility, SEO, and web traffic. (Side note: We eventually acquired tula.com, but that’s another story.) When Dr. Raj’s article went live on Health Magazine’s site, I reposted it to our blog, crediting her as the author and linking to the original article. Standard stuff, right?

Life went on. We kept building our business, sharing content, and selling products. Then, out of nowhere, I got a letter in the mail.

It was a trademark violation notice. The claim? We had used the stock photo without proper rights. The demand? Pay $552 or face a lawsuit.

Enter the Trademark Troll

After some digging, I discovered that this company’s business model was essentially a scam. They scraped the internet for photos being used out of compliance, then sent demand letters to unsuspecting businesses. Their game? Intimidation for profit.

Now, $552 might not sound like much, but in the early days of TULA, every dollar counted. Paying even $100 for a random blog photo felt like a gut punch. But the alternative—getting sued—wasn’t any better.

I was furious. A classic trademark troll was shaking me down, and I felt so incredibly frustrated that I had to deal with this bullshit.

Seeking Advice

I called a lawyer friend, who advised me to pay the fee and move on. “It’s not worth the hassle,” he said.

“Fuck that!” I snapped.

Next, I called my brother, who’s also a lawyer. His advice was slightly different: reach out to the troll, explain that the author of the article is our co-founder, and chalk it up to a misunderstanding. Maybe, just maybe, they’d let it slide.

Spoiler alert: they didn’t.

My brother got on a call with the troll’s representative, but it quickly turned hostile. “She basically told me to pay up or get sued,” he reported.

My brother was as angry as me. Maybe more.

Back to square one.

The Lightbulb Moment

Frustrated, I decided to dig deeper. Where did this photo even come from?

I ran a reverse image search on Google. Among the results, two stood out: one linked to the trademark troll’s website, and the other to a personal blog. On the blog, I found the same photo, along with others like it.

That’s when it hit me: what if I bought the photo outright? If I owned it, they couldn’t sue me for using my own property.

Taking Action

I called my brother with the idea. “Let’s buy the photo directly from the photographer,” I said. “We’ll ensure the rights cover digital and all-time usage—past, present, and future.”

“I love it!” he replied.

I reached out to the photographer, negotiated the deal (because of course, I had to), and secured the rights to the photo. The contract explicitly freed us from all liability and granted perpetual ownership.

Here’s the email exchange…

And, here’s the agreement…

Now armed with full ownership, we prepared our counterattack.

Turning the Tables

My brother called the troll to inform them that we now owned the photo outright. Their response? They went ballistic. “You can’t do that!” they yelled. “You still have to pay us, or else…”

So, we played their game.

We took their original legal letter demanding $552, copied it word for word, and switched the defendant’s name from mine to theirs. Then, we sent it back to them, demanding they pay us $552—or else.

I was so happy…

“FUCK OFF TROLLS!”

Guess what?

We never heard from them again.

Victory Over the Troll

And that’s how we outsmarted a bottom-feeding, low-life trademark troll, turned the tables, and declared absolute and glorious victory.

Sometimes, the best wins come from refusing to roll over—and finding creative ways to fight back.

How I Outsmarted a Trademark Troll Shaking Me Down for $552 Read More »

One Degree of Change

“She wants you to take her out.”

“Come visit me for a weekend at school.”

“Let’s go check out Exhibit Hall A.”

“But have you thought about…?”

At first glance, these statements seem small and insignificant. But every one of them changed my life in ways I could never have imagined.

Life has a way of turning the tiniest moments into the most consequential outcomes. I was reminded of this over the weekend while skiing on the hill. I watched my fellow ski patrollers respond to a code on the side of the mountain, helping someone who had made just one wrong turn. A single degree off course was all it took to change their day—or even their life—forever.

The same holds true in our everyday interactions. The impact of those small moments may not reveal itself immediately—it could take days, weeks, or even years—but they carry the potential to alter the trajectory of our lives in profound ways.

One degree.

A friend of mine, Wiley, reminded me of this recently. It only takes one degree—a single small decision, action, or moment—to change someone’s life or even your own.

Think about the ripple effect of a simple “hello” to a stranger who may have lost hope.

Or the unexpected phone call to a friend you haven’t spoken to in years.

Or the question someone poses to you—or you pose to yourself—that unlocks a new path forward.

As we step into the new year, many of us will make resolutions and promises to ourselves and others. If you’re one of those people, remember this:

It doesn’t take a monumental shift to make a difference. Sometimes, the smallest adjustments can have the biggest impact.

You might not see the effects right away, but believe me, one degree can set you on a course toward a future you never dreamed possible.

One Degree of Change Read More »

Scroll to Top